Harness Dickey
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
    • Professional Staff
    • Attorneys
    • Life at Harness Dickey
    • Community
    • Global IP Management & Tracking
    • Global Network
    • Diversity
    • Offices
    • Careers
  • IP Atlas
    • Harness Dickey Strategies to Protect Your Company From an IP Lawsuit
    • Harness Dickey Confidentiality Agreement Checklist
    • Legal Notice
    • Practice Areas
    • IP Atlas
    • Post Grant Review
    • Inter Partes Review
    • Current Openings
    • Welcome to the Harness Dickey Staff Page
    • Professional Staff
    • Attorneys
    • Life at Harness Dickey
    • Community
    • Global IP Management & Tracking
    • Global Network
    • Diversity
    • Global Network
    • Foreign Clients Doing Business in the U.S.
    • Domestic Clients Doing Business Abroad
    • Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition
    • Appellate
    • Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review & Other PTO Proceedings
    • Domain Name Disputes
    • Trademark Litigation
    • Copyright Litigation
    • Patent Litigation
    • Cross Border Transactions
    • Licensing & Joint Ventures
    • Due Diligence
    • FTO Opinions
    • Patent Prosecution
    • Trademark & Domain Name Protection
    • Maximizing Trademark Rights
    • Enforcement
    • TTAB Proceedings
    • Global Trademark Strategy
    • Anticounterfeiting
    • Trademark Selection, Prosecution & Registration
    • Customs & Border Protection
    • Copyright Registration & Counseling
    • Authors
    • Page Not Found
    • Privacy Statement
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
    • News & Awards
    • People
    • Offices
    • Careers
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Our business model is to cultivate lawyers who know all there is to know about intellectual property, whether it be special requirements under the America Invents Act (AIA), patenting chemical compositions and pharmaceuticals, current developments in software patenting, or combating “bad patents” in federal court litigation.  Lawyers from our various practice groups enjoy sharing their views in our blogs. Please join our audience and help us enrich the discussion. We welcome your participation and insight.

  • All Categories
    • All Categories
    • BioPharma
    • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
    • Featured
    • Harnessing the Lessons of IP
    • IP Management
    • IPR-PGR
    • Licensing
    • Litigation
    • Patent Prosecution
    • Trademarks
  • 2015
    • All Years
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
  • Authors
    • John H. Ambrose, Jr.John H. Ambrose, Jr. 2
    • Tyson B. BensonTyson B. Benson 2
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 4
    • Elizabeth K. BrockElizabeth K. Brock 7
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 185
    • Donald J. DaleyDonald J. Daley 1
    • Darin W. DeaverDarin W. Deaver 1
    • Gregory S. DeLassusGregory S. DeLassus 44
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 3
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 10
    • Mark A. Frentrup, Ph.D.Mark A. Frentrup, Ph.D. 3
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 1
    • Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D.Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D. 3
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 1
    • Robert J. LenihanRobert J. Lenihan 1
    • Joshua A. PartingtonJoshua A. Partington 2
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 14
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 13
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 3
    • Neal D. SanbornNeal D. Sanborn 4
    • Jeffrey L. SnyderJeffrey L. Snyder 1
    • Gregory A. StobbsGregory A. Stobbs 9
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 3
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 2
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 1
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 302
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 8
    • Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D.Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D. 2

  • October 4, 2017

    Aqua Products: Amendments in IPR Proceedings Come Roaring to the Forefront

    More

  • October 4, 2017

    It May Have Just Gotten a Little Easier to Amend Claims in an IPR

    More

  • October 1, 2017

    Technology Policies Protect The Company and its IP

    More

  • September 26, 2017

    Broadest Reasonable Construction is Not One Not Precluded by the Specification, but is One Consistent with the Specification

    More

  • September 22, 2017

    Employee Residence is Not the Defendant’s Regular and Established Place of Business

    More

  • September 21, 2017

    Corroboration of the Inventor is Necessary, but Evaluated Under a Rule of Reason, Considering the Totality of the Circumstances

    More

December 30, 2015

That’s the Way the Cookie Crumbles

IPR-PGR.com

Matt Cutler’s Professional Blog: Harnessing Patent Office Litigation: A Comprehensive Guide to Inter Partes Review and Post Grant Review Proceedings

December 29, 2015

Rugous – the Right Word for the Right Shape

December 28, 2015

Method to Screen Equipment Operator for Impairment Not Patent Eligible

December 28, 2015

Belief in Invalidity Does Not Prevent Liability for Inducement, Lack of Infringement Does

December 22, 2015

Frustoconical – the Right Word for the Right Shape

patent law pharma law biopharma patents

December 22, 2015

PTAB Rejects Challenge to Onglyza® Patent

December 22, 2015

Better Protection By Design

December 17, 2015

PTAB Incorrectly Determined that Claimed Element was Printed Matter where that Matter was not Claimed for its Communicative Content

December 17, 2015

Teaching Away Must Be Apparent from the Art as a Whole, and not Just Isolated Examples

December 17, 2015

Federal Circuit Addresses Substantial Evidence as Standard of Review in IPR

December 15, 2015

Companulate – the Right Word for the Right Shape

December 15, 2015

The PTAB Can Institute Post Grant Trial on a Legal Ground Not Raised in the Petition

December 9, 2015

Sec. 103(c) Saves Patent Claims in IPR Final Written Decision

December 7, 2015

Federal Circuit Upholds Constitutionality of Post-Issuance Trials

December 4, 2015

Federal Circuit Weighs in on IPR Again, and Judge Newman Regains Her Footing as Pro-Patent Crusader

November 30, 2015

PTAB Finds Different Claim Terms Have the Same Meaning

November 25, 2015

Federal Circuit Issues Second Reversal in Favor of a Patent Owner

November 24, 2015

3 Years of Inter Partes Review – By The Numbers

November 17, 2015

PTAB’s Ambiguous Language Is Basis For Federal Circuit Vacating PTAB’s Opinion

November 11, 2015

Board Offers New Technique to Solve an Often-Raised IPR Issue

Posts navigation

1 2 … 5 Load more posts

Stay current

  • Subscribe to our Blogs
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2017 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved.