Harness Dickey
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
    • Professional Staff
    • Attorneys
    • Life at Harness Dickey
    • Community
    • Global IP Management & Tracking
    • Global Network
    • Diversity
    • Offices
    • Careers
  • IP Atlas
    • Harness Dickey Strategies to Protect Your Company From an IP Lawsuit
    • Harness Dickey Confidentiality Agreement Checklist
    • Legal Notice
    • Practice Areas
    • IP Atlas
    • Post Grant Review
    • Inter Partes Review
    • Current Openings
    • Welcome to the Harness Dickey Staff Page
    • Professional Staff
    • Attorneys
    • Life at Harness Dickey
    • Community
    • Global IP Management & Tracking
    • Global Network
    • Diversity
    • Global Network
    • Foreign Clients Doing Business in the U.S.
    • Domestic Clients Doing Business Abroad
    • Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition
    • Appellate
    • Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review & Other PTO Proceedings
    • Domain Name Disputes
    • Trademark Litigation
    • Copyright Litigation
    • Patent Litigation
    • Cross Border Transactions
    • Licensing & Joint Ventures
    • Due Diligence
    • FTO Opinions
    • Patent Prosecution
    • Trademark & Domain Name Protection
    • Maximizing Trademark Rights
    • Enforcement
    • TTAB Proceedings
    • Global Trademark Strategy
    • Anticounterfeiting
    • Trademark Selection, Prosecution & Registration
    • Customs & Border Protection
    • Copyright Registration & Counseling
    • Authors
    • Page Not Found
    • Privacy Statement
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
    • News & Awards
    • People
    • Offices
    • Careers
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Our business model is to cultivate lawyers who know all there is to know about intellectual property, whether it be special requirements under the America Invents Act (AIA), patenting chemical compositions and pharmaceuticals, current developments in software patenting, or combating “bad patents” in federal court litigation.  Lawyers from our various practice groups enjoy sharing their views in our blogs. Please join our audience and help us enrich the discussion. We welcome your participation and insight.

  • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
    • All Categories
    • BioPharma
    • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
    • Featured
    • Harnessing the Lessons of IP
    • IP Management
    • IPR-PGR
    • Licensing
    • Litigation
    • Patent Prosecution
    • Trademarks
  • All Years
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
  • Authors
    • John H. Ambrose, Jr.John H. Ambrose, Jr. 2
    • Tyson B. BensonTyson B. Benson 2
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 4
    • Elizabeth K. BrockElizabeth K. Brock 7
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 185
    • Donald J. DaleyDonald J. Daley 1
    • Darin W. DeaverDarin W. Deaver 1
    • Gregory S. DeLassusGregory S. DeLassus 44
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 3
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 10
    • Mark A. Frentrup, Ph.D.Mark A. Frentrup, Ph.D. 3
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 1
    • Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D.Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D. 3
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 1
    • Robert J. LenihanRobert J. Lenihan 1
    • Joshua A. PartingtonJoshua A. Partington 2
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 14
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 13
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 3
    • Neal D. SanbornNeal D. Sanborn 4
    • Jeffrey L. SnyderJeffrey L. Snyder 1
    • Gregory A. StobbsGregory A. Stobbs 9
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 3
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 2
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 1
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 302
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 8
    • Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D.Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D. 2

  • October 4, 2017

    Aqua Products: Amendments in IPR Proceedings Come Roaring to the Forefront

    More

  • October 4, 2017

    It May Have Just Gotten a Little Easier to Amend Claims in an IPR

    More

  • October 1, 2017

    Technology Policies Protect The Company and its IP

    More

  • September 26, 2017

    Broadest Reasonable Construction is Not One Not Precluded by the Specification, but is One Consistent with the Specification

    More

  • September 22, 2017

    Employee Residence is Not the Defendant’s Regular and Established Place of Business

    More

  • September 21, 2017

    Corroboration of the Inventor is Necessary, but Evaluated Under a Rule of Reason, Considering the Totality of the Circumstances

    More

June 19, 2017

Missed opportunity: Federal Circuit Again Offers No Clarifying Insight on Alice’s Two-Step Framework

April 28, 2017

Ready, Set, Nano-Race!

March 2, 2017

Chemistry & Nanotechnology Developments to Watch in 2017

February 9, 2017

2016’s Top Patent and Trade Secret Developments for Chemistry and Nanotechnology

February 9, 2017

USPTO Claim Construction Standards for Inter Partes Review Proceedings

February 9, 2017

USPTO Standards of Review for Inter Partes Review Proceedings

February 9, 2017

USPTO Errs in Failing to Carry Burden to Support Rejection

February 9, 2017

On-Sale Bar for Contractor and Supplier Activities

February 9, 2017

Federal Trade Secrets Act

February 9, 2017

Enhanced Damages for Willful Infringement

Stay current

  • Subscribe to our Blogs
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2017 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved.