Harness Dickey
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
    • Careers
    • Offices
  • IP Atlas
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Our business model is to cultivate lawyers who know all there is to know about intellectual property, whether it be special requirements under the America Invents Act (AIA), patenting chemical compositions and pharmaceuticals, current developments in software patenting, or combating “bad patents” in federal court litigation.  Lawyers from our various practice groups enjoy sharing their views in our blogs. Please join our audience and help us enrich the discussion. We welcome your participation and insight.

  • Litigation

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • Antitrust Issues
        • Competitor Dynamics
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
        • Interchangeability
      • BioPharma
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • quIPs
      • Trademarks
  • All Years
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
  • Authors
    • John H. Ambrose, Jr.John H. Ambrose, Jr. 2
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • Elizabeth K. BrockElizabeth K. Brock 7
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 1
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 15
    • Donald J. DaleyDonald J. Daley 1
    • Darin W. DeaverDarin W. Deaver 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 11
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 10
    • Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D.Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D. 4
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 1
    • Robert J. LenihanRobert J. Lenihan 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Michael R. NyeMichael R. Nye 1
    • Joshua A. PartingtonJoshua A. Partington 4
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 15
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 15
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 14
    • Jeffrey L. SnyderJeffrey L. Snyder 1
    • David J. SteinDavid J. Stein 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 3
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 1
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 15
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 13
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
    • Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D.Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D. 3

  • September 12, 2019

    The Emerging Battleground of Machine Learning Patent Protection

    More

  • Harness Dickey IP Law & The Constitution

    August 30, 2019

    Celebrating Labor Day in Patents

    More

  • August 25, 2019

    Trick Question: How Many Utility Patents has the USPTO Issued?

    More

  • August 20, 2019

    Protect Your Intellectual Property or You’ll Lose Your Shirt

    More

  • mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

    August 16, 2019

    Patent Eligibility Can be Determined on the Pleadings, Provided Claim Construction is Not at Issue

    More

  • August 16, 2019

    Liberal Application of Relation Back Doctrine Saved Infringement Claims from Being Time Barred

    More

mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

August 16, 2019

Patent Eligibility Can be Determined on the Pleadings, Provided Claim Construction is Not at Issue

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

August 16, 2019

Liberal Application of Relation Back Doctrine Saved Infringement Claims from Being Time Barred

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

August 14, 2019

Any Compound May Look Obvious Once Someone Has Made it, But Federal Circuit Rejects Convoluted Obviousness Argument

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

August 12, 2019

Board Erred in Failing to Apply § 112, Paragraph 6 to Mechanical Control Assembly

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey Technology Lawyers

August 12, 2019

Arguments Regarding Enablement Confirm Narrow Scope of Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 30, 2019

Infringement was a Matter of Degree

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

May 30, 2019

Lack of All Substantial Rights Deprived Plaintiff of Statutory Standing, But Not Article III Standing

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 23, 2019

We Shall fight in the Fields and in the Streets, We Shall Fight in the Hills; We Shall Never Surrender.

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 21, 2019

Detailed Explanation and Corroboration Made “Sham Affidavit” Doctrine Inapplicable

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 15, 2019

The Written Description Must Provide More than A Mere Wish or Hope that the Invention Would Work

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 14, 2019

Patent’s Description Was Inconsistent with Patentee’s Claim Construction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 13, 2019

Lack of Reasonable Expectation of Success Meant Claims Weren’t Obvious

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 26, 2019

FDA Skepticism Supported Non-obviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 24, 2019

Supreme Court Set to Decide if USPTO Can Make Patent and Trademark Applicants Pay Its Attorneys’ Fees in Civil Actions

By: Joshua A. Partington, Associate

April 18, 2019

3 CBMs Hit Their Targets

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 17, 2019

Federal Circuit Gives a Master Class in Claim Construction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

April 11, 2019

Federal Circuit holds PTO to “Reasonably Continuous” Diligence rather than “Continuously Reasonable” Diligence Standard

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey patent Attorneys Detroit St. Louis Dallas Washington, DC

April 8, 2019

When There is a Dispute Regarding the Proper Scope of the Claims, the Court must Resolve that Dispute

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 4, 2019

Startup Golf Entertainment Center’s Antitrust Claims Whiff Three Times Against Topgolf; But Will it Re-Tee?

By: Scott E. Yackey, Associate

March 28, 2019

Great Expectations: An Expectation of Success is Needed to Make Invention Obvious

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts navigation

1 2 … 4 Load more posts

Stay current

  • Subscribe to our Blogs
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2019 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved.