Litigation | Harness Dickey

September 18, 2018

The Real World is Irrelevant in Judging the Similarity Between DETROIT ATHLETIC CO. and DETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB

More
September 17, 2018

Do Over — Different Evidence and Different Evidentiary Standard Allow IPR to Reach Different Conclusion of Validity than ITC

More
September 17, 2018

Expert Testimony Critical to Determining Meaning of Prior Art to a PHOSITA

More
September 17, 2018

Clearly Defining A Term Without Providing Any Way to Determine When it has Been “Optimized” as Claimed Dooms Claims Under 112

More
September 17, 2018

Petitioner Bears the Ultimate Burden of Persuasion With Respect to Real Party in Interest

More
September 17, 2018

Blocking Patent Can Explain Long-Felt But Unmet Need, Reducing Importance of Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness

More

IPR-PGR.com

Matt Cutler’s Professional Blog: Harnessing Patent Office Litigation: A Comprehensive Guide to Inter Partes Review and Post Grant Review Proceedings

September 17, 2018

Do Over — Different Evidence and Different Evidentiary Standard Allow IPR to Reach Different Conclusion of Validity than ITC

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

September 17, 2018

Clearly Defining A Term Without Providing Any Way to Determine When it has Been “Optimized” as Claimed Dooms Claims Under 112

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

September 17, 2018

Blocking Patent Can Explain Long-Felt But Unmet Need, Reducing Importance of Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

September 17, 2018

Just Because Seldom was Heard a Discouraging Word Did Not Mean The Invention Was Obvious

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey patent Attorneys Detroit St. Louis Dallas Washington, DC

September 17, 2018

“Capable of” Construction (Rather than “Configured to” Construction) Dooms Apparatus, but Not Method Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

September 5, 2018

Federal Circuit Remands After Patentee Failed to Disclose Priority Application to Standards Organization

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

July 30, 2018

District Court Improperly Imported Limitations into the Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Image of Computer Display Monitors

July 30, 2018

Displaying Data is an Even More Abstract Idea Than Patent Eligibility

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Image of Semiconductor

July 30, 2018

Be Careful What You Wish For: Broad Claim Construction Sought by Patent Owner Results in Invalidity for Lack of Enablement

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

July 30, 2018

What’s Zup? Water Board Patent Obvious; Secondary Considerations Too Weak to Show Otherwise

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Image of GoPro POV Camera

July 30, 2018

Distribution of Catalogs at a Tradeshow Was Accessible with Reasonable Diligence, and was a Printed Publication Under 102(b)

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

July 30, 2018

Materials Available Online, Identified in Federal Register Before the Critical Date Were Printed Publications

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigation IPR Attorneys

July 13, 2018

Federal Circuit Finds No Error in District Court Determination the Claimed Invention was not Obvious

By:

May 2, 2014

At Harness Dickey’s Urging, the Supreme Court Made it Easier to Get Attorney’s Fees in Patent Cases

By:

December 13, 2013

Prove that You Are DIFFERIN Enough!

By:

June 17, 2013

The Fed Circuit is applying Bowman Already?

By:

April 25, 2011

TiVo Inc. v. Echostar Corp.

By:

April 8, 2011

THE ORAL ARGUMENT IN MYRIAD, April 4th, 2011

By:

March 17, 2011

IS THE END IN SIGHT FOR PATENT MISMARKING CLAIMS?

By:

November 7, 2009

Perfecting Security Interests in Intellectual Property Is Not a Perfect Process

By: Robert J. Lenihan, Principal