Harness Dickey
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
    • Professional Staff
    • Attorneys
    • Life at Harness Dickey
    • Community
    • Global IP Management & Tracking
    • Global Network
    • Diversity
    • Offices
    • Careers
  • IP Atlas
    • Harness Dickey Strategies to Protect Your Company From an IP Lawsuit
    • Harness Dickey Confidentiality Agreement Checklist
    • Legal Notice
    • Practice Areas
    • IP Atlas
    • Post Grant Review
    • Inter Partes Review
    • Current Openings
    • Welcome to the Harness Dickey Staff Page
    • Professional Staff
    • Attorneys
    • Life at Harness Dickey
    • Community
    • Global IP Management & Tracking
    • Global Network
    • Diversity
    • Global Network
    • Foreign Clients Doing Business in the U.S.
    • Domestic Clients Doing Business Abroad
    • Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition
    • Appellate
    • Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review & Other PTO Proceedings
    • Domain Name Disputes
    • Trademark Litigation
    • Copyright Litigation
    • Patent Litigation
    • Cross Border Transactions
    • Licensing & Joint Ventures
    • Due Diligence
    • FTO Opinions
    • Patent Prosecution
    • Trademark & Domain Name Protection
    • Maximizing Trademark Rights
    • Enforcement
    • TTAB Proceedings
    • Global Trademark Strategy
    • Anticounterfeiting
    • Trademark Selection, Prosecution & Registration
    • Customs & Border Protection
    • Copyright Registration & Counseling
    • Authors
    • Page Not Found
    • Privacy Statement
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
    • News & Awards
    • People
    • Offices
    • Careers
    • About Us
    • Blog
    • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Our business model is to cultivate lawyers who know all there is to know about intellectual property, whether it be special requirements under the America Invents Act (AIA), patenting chemical compositions and pharmaceuticals, current developments in software patenting, or combating “bad patents” in federal court litigation.  Lawyers from our various practice groups enjoy sharing their views in our blogs. Please join our audience and help us enrich the discussion. We welcome your participation and insight.

  • Litigation
    • All Categories
    • BioPharma
    • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
    • Featured
    • Harnessing the Lessons of IP
    • IP Management
    • IPR-PGR
    • Licensing
    • Litigation
    • Patent Prosecution
    • Trademarks
  • All Years
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
  • Authors
    • John H. Ambrose, Jr.John H. Ambrose, Jr. 2
    • Tyson B. BensonTyson B. Benson 2
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 4
    • Elizabeth K. BrockElizabeth K. Brock 7
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 185
    • Donald J. DaleyDonald J. Daley 1
    • Darin W. DeaverDarin W. Deaver 1
    • Gregory S. DeLassusGregory S. DeLassus 44
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 3
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 10
    • Mark A. Frentrup, Ph.D.Mark A. Frentrup, Ph.D. 3
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 1
    • Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D.Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D. 3
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 1
    • Robert J. LenihanRobert J. Lenihan 1
    • Joshua A. PartingtonJoshua A. Partington 2
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 14
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 13
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 3
    • Neal D. SanbornNeal D. Sanborn 4
    • Jeffrey L. SnyderJeffrey L. Snyder 1
    • Gregory A. StobbsGregory A. Stobbs 9
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 3
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 2
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 1
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 302
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 8
    • Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D.Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D. 2

  • October 4, 2017

    Aqua Products: Amendments in IPR Proceedings Come Roaring to the Forefront

    More

  • October 4, 2017

    It May Have Just Gotten a Little Easier to Amend Claims in an IPR

    More

  • October 1, 2017

    Technology Policies Protect The Company and its IP

    More

  • September 26, 2017

    Broadest Reasonable Construction is Not One Not Precluded by the Specification, but is One Consistent with the Specification

    More

  • September 22, 2017

    Employee Residence is Not the Defendant’s Regular and Established Place of Business

    More

  • September 21, 2017

    Corroboration of the Inventor is Necessary, but Evaluated Under a Rule of Reason, Considering the Totality of the Circumstances

    More

IPR-PGR.com

Matt Cutler’s Professional Blog: Harnessing Patent Office Litigation: A Comprehensive Guide to Inter Partes Review and Post Grant Review Proceedings

May 2, 2014

At Harness Dickey’s Urging, the Supreme Court Made it Easier to Get Attorney’s Fees in Patent Cases

December 13, 2013

Prove that You Are DIFFERIN Enough!

June 17, 2013

The Fed Circuit is applying Bowman Already?

April 27, 2011

Incorporation by reference does not expand claim scope

April 25, 2011

TiVo Inc. v. Echostar Corp.

April 8, 2011

THE ORAL ARGUMENT IN MYRIAD, April 4th, 2011

March 17, 2011

IS THE END IN SIGHT FOR PATENT MISMARKING CLAIMS?

November 7, 2009

Perfecting Security Interests in Intellectual Property Is Not a Perfect Process

August 13, 2009

Litigation Avoidance Strategy No. 1: Better Patent Claims = Less Litigation

Stay current

  • Subscribe to our Blogs
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2017 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved.