Litigation | Harness Dickey

June 18, 2021

Recognizing Juneteenth

More
June 14, 2021

Flagging a Potential Trademark Issue

More
June 11, 2021

Picture This: An Improved Camera is an Abstract Idea

More
June 11, 2021

The Specification may be Eligible, But the Claims Were Not

More
June 10, 2021

Antitrust Law is Not Appealing to the Federal Circuit

More
June 3, 2021

Peloton Motion to Dismiss Icon Health & Fitness Counterclaims Granted-in-part, and Denied-in-Part

More

Standard Essential Patents

June 12, 2021

Intrinsic Evidence > Dictionary Definitions, Analogies, and Purported Plain Meaning

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

June 11, 2021

Picture This: An Improved Camera is an Abstract Idea

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

June 11, 2021

The Specification may be Eligible, But the Claims Were Not

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

June 10, 2021

Antitrust Law is Not Appealing to the Federal Circuit

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

IP Litigation and Contested Matters

June 3, 2021

The Disclaimer Doctrine Prevents Patent Owners from Construing the Claims Differently in Court than in the USPTO

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Patent Litigation and Laches

June 1, 2021

Complying with All Rules and Paying $7 Million in Fees Can Still Constitute Prosecution Laches

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

May 28, 2021

Don’t Forget to Claim What the Device Is, Not Just What the Device Does

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

image of light bulb to suggest hypothetical biosimilar case study

May 28, 2021

The References are not the Only Sources a Person of Ordinary Skill Would Consider

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

circular logic of patent claims and litigation

May 26, 2021

Applying Vitiation to “Annular Cover” was Circular Reasoning

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Intellectual Property Law Blog

May 12, 2021

Being Able to Practice the Invention is not the Same as Being Able to Practice the Full Scope of the Invention

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 12, 2021

A Cease and Desist Letter Can Confer Personal Jurisdiction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

March 8, 2021

Hindsight May be 20-20, but it has no Place in Evaluating Obviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey patent Attorneys Detroit St. Louis Dallas Washington, DC

January 6, 2021

Even If Phrase Was In the Preamble, it is a Claim Limitation that was Not Met

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

December 29, 2020

Late Request For Leave to Amend Complaint to try to Save Patent on Ineligible Subject Matter Denied

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

photo of chess pieces representing biosimilar competitive dynamics

December 7, 2020

Breach of Confidentiality Agreement Required Transfer for Resulting Patents

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

November 20, 2020

Apparatus Claims Sometimes Incorporate Process Limitations, but Not this Time

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

August 28, 2020

Inventorship, Unlike a Claim, is a “Nose of Wax”

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

August 27, 2020

Pointed Tip is Not a Substantially Flat Surface

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

August 27, 2020

Clear Claim Language Trumped Written Description in Construction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

August 27, 2020

Upper and Lower Claim Limitations Leave Patent Owner Feeling Down

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal