Harness Dickey
  • COVID-19 IP Update
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
    • Careers
    • Offices
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Our business model is to cultivate lawyers who know all there is to know about intellectual property, whether it be special requirements under the America Invents Act (AIA), patenting chemical compositions and pharmaceuticals, current developments in software patenting, or combating “bad patents” in federal court litigation.  Lawyers from our various practice groups enjoy sharing their views in our blogs. Please join our audience and help us enrich the discussion. We welcome your participation and insight.

  • Litigation

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • Antitrust Issues
        • Competitor Dynamics
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
        • Interchangeability
      • BioPharma
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • COVID-19 IP Update
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • quIPs
      • Trademarks
      • Uncategorized
  • All Years
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
  • Authors
    • John H. Ambrose, Jr.John H. Ambrose, Jr. 2
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • Elizabeth K. BrockElizabeth K. Brock 7
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 1
    • William J. CoughlinWilliam J. Coughlin 1
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 15
    • Donald J. DaleyDonald J. Daley 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 2
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 11
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 10
    • Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D.Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D. 4
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 1
    • Robert J. LenihanRobert J. Lenihan 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Michael R. NyeMichael R. Nye 1
    • Joshua A. PartingtonJoshua A. Partington 4
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 15
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 15
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 15
    • Jeffrey L. SnyderJeffrey L. Snyder 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 3
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 1
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 15
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 13
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
    • Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D.Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D. 3
  • Image of Covid 19 Virus

    April 6, 2020

    COVID-19 IP UPDATE — April 6, 2020

    More

  • April 3, 2020

    Allegations of Infringement Should not have been Enjoined without Evidence of Bad Faith

    More

  • April 3, 2020

    Removal Improper Because Trade Secret Claim did not Necessarily Raise Inventorship Issues

    More

  • April 1, 2020

    Descriptive Use or Trademark Infringement?

    More

  • Harness Dickey Trademark Attorneys St. Louis Detroit Dallas Washington, DC

    March 28, 2020

    Trademark Litigation Over “You’re Never Done” Shows Sometimes You Are

    More

  • image of curling wave to evoke connection between endless summer and endless litigation

    March 28, 2020

    Endless Litigation

    More

April 3, 2020

Allegations of Infringement Should not have been Enjoined without Evidence of Bad Faith

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

March 17, 2020

An Improved Step in a Diagnostic Method is Patentable Subject Matter

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

March 16, 2020

Design Patent Infringement Affirmed Where Defendant Did Not Proffer Jury Instructions or Introduce Prior Art

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

March 13, 2020

Prosecution History Doesn’t Have to Rise to the Level of Disclaimer to Inform the meaning of the Disputed Claim Term

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

March 13, 2020

Patent’s Prosecution History Informs the Meaning of the Claim Language, Saving them from Invalidity

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

March 13, 2020

First-Filed Declaratory Judgment Dismissed in Favor of Later-Filed Infringement Action

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

March 2, 2020

Federal Circuit Finds Lawyers Chose Advocacy over Candor

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey Patent Attorneys Dallas Detroit St. Louis Washington, DC

February 19, 2020

Licensee’s Failure to Mark Licensed Products Limits Patent Owner’s Recovery

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

February 13, 2020

A Binding Settlement Agreement Generally Moots the Action Even if it Requires Future Performance

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Intellectual Property Law Blog

February 6, 2020

You Mess With Me, You Mess With My Whole (Patent) Family

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

February 5, 2020

Only an Expert Can Testify about What Would Be Obvious to a Non-Expert

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

January 23, 2020

Affirmed: Patent Owner’s Claim Construction that Excluded Preferred Embodiments Was Not Correct

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

January 10, 2020

Lack of Showing of Criticality Dooms Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

January 7, 2020

Markush Groups Open to Additional Elements

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

December 27, 2019

Inherency Supplied Missing Claim Limitation in Obviousness Analysis

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

December 26, 2019

Points of Difference from Prior Art Did Not Make it to the Claims; Claims were Anticipated

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Intellectual Property Law Blog

December 19, 2019

Award of Attorneys’ Fees Hinges on a Finding of an Exceptional Case, Not an Exceptional Part of a Case

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

December 18, 2019

Patent Owner’s Praise for Other Inventions Destroyed Presumption of Nexus between Commercial Product and Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

December 18, 2019

It is Importation that Infringes under 35 USC § 271(g), Not Manufacture

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

December 16, 2019

Plaintiff Who Dismissed Patent Infringement Case Still Must Pay Defendant’s Attorneys’ Fees

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts navigation

1 2 … 6 Load more posts

Stay current

  • Subscribe to our Blogs
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2020 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved.