Litigation | Harness Dickey

November 13, 2018

HBO’s Trademark Warpath

More
November 13, 2018

Lustron Houses: The Home of the Future, Patented in 1947

More
November 9, 2018

Will Netflix have a Devil of Time Defending Suit Brought by Satanic Temple?

More
October 29, 2018

Fractional Patents

More
October 25, 2018

The Village (Patent) People

More
October 17, 2018

Game of Groans: HBO Files Trademark Opposition Against Game of Thorns

More

IPR-PGR.com

Matt Cutler’s Professional Blog: Harnessing Patent Office Litigation: A Comprehensive Guide to Inter Partes Review and Post Grant Review Proceedings

October 12, 2018

The Board May Consider Non-Prior Art Evidence in Considering the Knowledge, Motivations, and Expectations of a PHOSITA Regarding the Prior Art

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

October 12, 2018

District Court Did Not Rely on Flawed Obvious to Try Rational

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Image of laptop displaying computer code

October 9, 2018

Details Save Claims from Invalidity Under Section 101

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

September 17, 2018

Do Over — Different Evidence and Different Evidentiary Standard Allow IPR to Reach Different Conclusion of Validity than ITC

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

September 17, 2018

Clearly Defining A Term Without Providing Any Way to Determine When it has Been “Optimized” as Claimed Dooms Claims Under 112

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

September 17, 2018

Blocking Patent Can Explain Long-Felt But Unmet Need, Reducing Importance of Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

September 17, 2018

Just Because Seldom was Heard a Discouraging Word Did Not Mean The Invention Was Obvious

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey patent Attorneys Detroit St. Louis Dallas Washington, DC

September 17, 2018

“Capable of” Construction (Rather than “Configured to” Construction) Dooms Apparatus, but Not Method Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

September 5, 2018

Federal Circuit Remands After Patentee Failed to Disclose Priority Application to Standards Organization

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

July 30, 2018

District Court Improperly Imported Limitations into the Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Image of Computer Display Monitors

July 30, 2018

Displaying Data is an Even More Abstract Idea Than Patent Eligibility

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Image of Semiconductor

July 30, 2018

Be Careful What You Wish For: Broad Claim Construction Sought by Patent Owner Results in Invalidity for Lack of Enablement

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

July 30, 2018

What’s Zup? Water Board Patent Obvious; Secondary Considerations Too Weak to Show Otherwise

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Image of GoPro POV Camera

July 30, 2018

Distribution of Catalogs at a Tradeshow Was Accessible with Reasonable Diligence, and was a Printed Publication Under 102(b)

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

July 30, 2018

Materials Available Online, Identified in Federal Register Before the Critical Date Were Printed Publications

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigation IPR Attorneys

July 13, 2018

Federal Circuit Finds No Error in District Court Determination the Claimed Invention was not Obvious

By:

May 2, 2014

At Harness Dickey’s Urging, the Supreme Court Made it Easier to Get Attorney’s Fees in Patent Cases

By:

December 13, 2013

Prove that You Are DIFFERIN Enough!

By:

June 17, 2013

The Fed Circuit is applying Bowman Already?

By:

April 25, 2011

TiVo Inc. v. Echostar Corp.

By: