Harness Dickey
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
    • Careers
    • Offices
  • IP Atlas
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Our business model is to cultivate lawyers who know all there is to know about intellectual property, whether it be special requirements under the America Invents Act (AIA), patenting chemical compositions and pharmaceuticals, current developments in software patenting, or combating “bad patents” in federal court litigation.  Lawyers from our various practice groups enjoy sharing their views in our blogs. Please join our audience and help us enrich the discussion. We welcome your participation and insight.

  • Litigation

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • Antitrust Issues
        • Competitor Dynamics
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
        • Interchangeability
      • BioPharma
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • Trademarks
  • All Years
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
  • Authors
    • John H. Ambrose, Jr.John H. Ambrose, Jr. 2
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • Elizabeth K. BrockElizabeth K. Brock 7
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 1
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 15
    • Donald J. DaleyDonald J. Daley 1
    • Darin W. DeaverDarin W. Deaver 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 11
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 9
    • Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D.Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D. 4
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 1
    • Robert J. LenihanRobert J. Lenihan 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Michael R. NyeMichael R. Nye 1
    • Joshua A. PartingtonJoshua A. Partington 4
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 15
    • Derek RichmondDerek Richmond 1
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 15
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 14
    • Jeffrey L. SnyderJeffrey L. Snyder 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 3
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 1
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 15
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 13
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
    • Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D.Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D. 3
  • Harness Dickey U.S. Supreme Court Patent Litigators

    June 24, 2019

    One Applicant Gets his Registration, but all Trademark Owners may be F-U-C-T

    More

  • June 24, 2019

    Drafting Considerations after ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc.

    More

  • Trademark Enforcement Attorneys

    June 18, 2019

    How is the Likelihood of Confusion Analysis Different in Registration Decisions Versus Infringement Decisions?

    More

  • Harness Dickey Patent Attorneys Dallas Detroit St. Louis Washington, DC

    June 18, 2019

    Consider All of the Patent Family’s Prosecution History When Communicating with the USPTO

    More

  • Harness Dickey IP Litigation St. Louis

    June 5, 2019

    Form-seekers and Non-disclosure Agreements

    More

  • June 4, 2019

    Does Your Trademark Have a 401(k)?

    More

IPR-PGR.com

Matt Cutler’s Professional Blog: Harnessing Patent Office Litigation: A Comprehensive Guide to Inter Partes Review and Post Grant Review Proceedings

May 30, 2019

Infringement was a Matter of Degree

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

May 30, 2019

Lack of All Substantial Rights Deprived Plaintiff of Statutory Standing, But Not Article III Standing

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 23, 2019

We Shall fight in the Fields and in the Streets, We Shall Fight in the Hills; We Shall Never Surrender.

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 21, 2019

Detailed Explanation and Corroboration Made “Sham Affidavit” Doctrine Inapplicable

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 15, 2019

The Written Description Must Provide More than A Mere Wish or Hope that the Invention Would Work

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 14, 2019

Patent’s Description Was Inconsistent with Patentee’s Claim Construction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 13, 2019

Lack of Reasonable Expectation of Success Meant Claims Weren’t Obvious

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 26, 2019

FDA Skepticism Supported Non-obviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 24, 2019

Supreme Court Set to Decide if USPTO Can Make Patent and Trademark Applicants Pay Its Attorneys’ Fees in Civil Actions

By: Joshua A. Partington, Associate

April 18, 2019

3 CBMs Hit Their Targets

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 17, 2019

Federal Circuit Gives a Master Class in Claim Construction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

April 11, 2019

Federal Circuit holds PTO to “Reasonably Continuous” Diligence rather than “Continuously Reasonable” Diligence Standard

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey patent Attorneys Detroit St. Louis Dallas Washington, DC

April 8, 2019

When There is a Dispute Regarding the Proper Scope of the Claims, the Court must Resolve that Dispute

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 4, 2019

Startup Golf Entertainment Center’s Antitrust Claims Whiff Three Times Against Topgolf; But Will it Re-Tee?

By: Scott E. Yackey, Associate

March 28, 2019

Great Expectations: An Expectation of Success is Needed to Make Invention Obvious

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

February 26, 2019

Invention that Can “Result in Life Altering Consequences” is Laudable but Still Abstract

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

February 22, 2019

Complaint Established Sufficient Facts to Support Claim for Inventorship

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

image of laptop displaying computer code

January 28, 2019

Anticipation is the Epitome of Obviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

photo of biosimilar medications

January 28, 2019

Working Backwards with the Benefit of Hindsight Does not Render Compound Obvious

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey Supreme Court IP Litigation

January 22, 2019

If a Sale Occurs in a Forest and No One is There to See it, is it Still a Sale? Yes.

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts navigation

1 2 … 4 Load more posts

Stay current

  • Subscribe to our Blogs
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2019 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved.