Harness Dickey
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
    • Careers
    • Offices
  • IP Atlas
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Our business model is to cultivate lawyers who know all there is to know about intellectual property, whether it be special requirements under the America Invents Act (AIA), patenting chemical compositions and pharmaceuticals, current developments in software patenting, or combating “bad patents” in federal court litigation.  Lawyers from our various practice groups enjoy sharing their views in our blogs. Please join our audience and help us enrich the discussion. We welcome your participation and insight.

  • All Categories

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • Antitrust Issues
        • Competitor Dynamics
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
        • Interchangeability
      • BioPharma
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • Trademarks
  • All Years
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
  • Authors
    • John H. Ambrose, Jr.John H. Ambrose, Jr. 2
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • Elizabeth K. BrockElizabeth K. Brock 7
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 1
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 15
    • Donald J. DaleyDonald J. Daley 1
    • Darin W. DeaverDarin W. Deaver 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 11
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 9
    • Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D.Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D. 4
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 1
    • Robert J. LenihanRobert J. Lenihan 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Michael R. NyeMichael R. Nye 1
    • Joshua A. PartingtonJoshua A. Partington 4
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 15
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 15
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 14
    • Jeffrey L. SnyderJeffrey L. Snyder 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 3
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 1
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 15
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 13
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
    • Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D.Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D. 3

  • August 20, 2019

    Protect Your Intellectual Property or You’ll Lose Your Shirt

    More

  • mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

    August 16, 2019

    Patent Eligibility Can be Determined on the Pleadings, Provided Claim Construction is Not at Issue

    More

  • August 16, 2019

    Liberal Application of Relation Back Doctrine Saved Infringement Claims from Being Time Barred

    More

  • August 14, 2019

    Any Compound May Look Obvious Once Someone Has Made it, But Federal Circuit Rejects Convoluted Obviousness Argument

    More

  • August 12, 2019

    Board Erred in Failing to Apply § 112, Paragraph 6 to Mechanical Control Assembly

    More

  • Harness Dickey Technology Lawyers

    August 12, 2019

    Arguments Regarding Enablement Confirm Narrow Scope of Claims

    More

August 20, 2019

Protect Your Intellectual Property or You’ll Lose Your Shirt

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

August 16, 2019

Patent Eligibility Can be Determined on the Pleadings, Provided Claim Construction is Not at Issue

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

August 16, 2019

Liberal Application of Relation Back Doctrine Saved Infringement Claims from Being Time Barred

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

August 14, 2019

Any Compound May Look Obvious Once Someone Has Made it, But Federal Circuit Rejects Convoluted Obviousness Argument

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

August 12, 2019

Board Erred in Failing to Apply § 112, Paragraph 6 to Mechanical Control Assembly

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey Technology Lawyers

August 12, 2019

Arguments Regarding Enablement Confirm Narrow Scope of Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

August 9, 2019

Merely Tangential Exception to Prosecution History Estoppel Saved Inartful Amendment from Barring Infringement by Equivalents

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey U.S. Supreme Court Patent Litigators

June 24, 2019

One Applicant Gets his Registration, but all Trademark Owners may be F-U-C-T

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

June 24, 2019

Drafting Considerations after ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc.

By: Nicholas S. Drysdale, Principal

Trademark Enforcement Attorneys

June 18, 2019

How is the Likelihood of Confusion Analysis Different in Registration Decisions Versus Infringement Decisions?

By: Joshua A. Partington, Associate

Harness Dickey Patent Attorneys Dallas Detroit St. Louis Washington, DC

June 18, 2019

Consider All of the Patent Family’s Prosecution History When Communicating with the USPTO

By: Jewell N. Briggs, Associate

Harness Dickey IP Litigation St. Louis

June 5, 2019

Form-seekers and Non-disclosure Agreements

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

June 4, 2019

Does Your Trademark Have a 401(k)?

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 30, 2019

Infringement was a Matter of Degree

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

May 30, 2019

Lack of All Substantial Rights Deprived Plaintiff of Statutory Standing, But Not Article III Standing

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 23, 2019

We Shall fight in the Fields and in the Streets, We Shall Fight in the Hills; We Shall Never Surrender.

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 21, 2019

Detailed Explanation and Corroboration Made “Sham Affidavit” Doctrine Inapplicable

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 20, 2019

Trademark Licensees Keep Their Rights When Their Bankrupt Licensors Reject the Licenses

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 15, 2019

The Written Description Must Provide More than A Mere Wish or Hope that the Invention Would Work

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 14, 2019

Patent’s Description Was Inconsistent with Patentee’s Claim Construction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts navigation

1 2 … 46 Load more posts

Stay current

  • Subscribe to our Blogs
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2019 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved.