Harness Dickey
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
    • Careers
    • Offices
  • IP Atlas
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Our business model is to cultivate lawyers who know all there is to know about intellectual property, whether it be special requirements under the America Invents Act (AIA), patenting chemical compositions and pharmaceuticals, current developments in software patenting, or combating “bad patents” in federal court litigation.  Lawyers from our various practice groups enjoy sharing their views in our blogs. Please join our audience and help us enrich the discussion. We welcome your participation and insight.

  • All Categories

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • Antitrust Issues
        • Competitor Dynamics
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
        • Interchangeability
      • BioPharma
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • Featured
      • Harnessing the Lessons of IP
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Licensing
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • Trademarks
      • Uncategorized
  • All Years
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
  • Authors
    • John H. Ambrose, Jr.John H. Ambrose, Jr. 2
    • Tyson B. BensonTyson B. Benson 2
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 6
    • Elizabeth K. BrockElizabeth K. Brock 7
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 1
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 15
    • Donald J. DaleyDonald J. Daley 1
    • Darin W. DeaverDarin W. Deaver 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 6
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 11
    • Mark A. Frentrup, Ph.D.Mark A. Frentrup, Ph.D. 3
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 9
    • Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D.Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D. 4
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 1
    • Robert J. LenihanRobert J. Lenihan 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • John E. MunroJohn E. Munro 1
    • Michael R. NyeMichael R. Nye 1
    • Joshua A. PartingtonJoshua A. Partington 2
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 15
    • Derek RichmondDerek Richmond 1
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 15
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 10
    • Jeffrey L. SnyderJeffrey L. Snyder 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 3
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 1
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 15
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 12
    • Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D.Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D. 3
  • Harness Dickey Trademark Attorneys St. Louis Detroit Dallas Washington, DC

    September 18, 2018

    The Real World is Irrelevant in Judging the Similarity Between DETROIT ATHLETIC CO. and DETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB

    More

  • September 17, 2018

    Do Over — Different Evidence and Different Evidentiary Standard Allow IPR to Reach Different Conclusion of Validity than ITC

    More

  • September 17, 2018

    Expert Testimony Critical to Determining Meaning of Prior Art to a PHOSITA

    More

  • mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

    September 17, 2018

    Clearly Defining A Term Without Providing Any Way to Determine When it has Been “Optimized” as Claimed Dooms Claims Under 112

    More

  • Harness Dickey IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

    September 17, 2018

    Petitioner Bears the Ultimate Burden of Persuasion With Respect to Real Party in Interest

    More

  • Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

    September 17, 2018

    Blocking Patent Can Explain Long-Felt But Unmet Need, Reducing Importance of Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness

    More

Harness Dickey Trademark Attorneys St. Louis Detroit Dallas Washington, DC

September 18, 2018

The Real World is Irrelevant in Judging the Similarity Between DETROIT ATHLETIC CO. and DETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

IPR-PGR.com

Matt Cutler’s Professional Blog: Harnessing Patent Office Litigation: A Comprehensive Guide to Inter Partes Review and Post Grant Review Proceedings

September 17, 2018

Do Over — Different Evidence and Different Evidentiary Standard Allow IPR to Reach Different Conclusion of Validity than ITC

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

September 17, 2018

Expert Testimony Critical to Determining Meaning of Prior Art to a PHOSITA

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

September 17, 2018

Clearly Defining A Term Without Providing Any Way to Determine When it has Been “Optimized” as Claimed Dooms Claims Under 112

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigation PTAB Proceedings

September 17, 2018

Petitioner Bears the Ultimate Burden of Persuasion With Respect to Real Party in Interest

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

September 17, 2018

Blocking Patent Can Explain Long-Felt But Unmet Need, Reducing Importance of Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

September 17, 2018

Just Because Seldom was Heard a Discouraging Word Did Not Mean The Invention Was Obvious

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey patent Attorneys Detroit St. Louis Dallas Washington, DC

September 17, 2018

“Capable of” Construction (Rather than “Configured to” Construction) Dooms Apparatus, but Not Method Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Image of DNA and CRISPR Technology

September 12, 2018

CRISPR-Cas9 Battle Continues: Federal Circuit sides with the Broad Institute and Affirms the PTAB’s Finding of No Interference In Fact

By: Jewell N. Briggs, Associate

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

September 5, 2018

Federal Circuit Remands After Patentee Failed to Disclose Priority Application to Standards Organization

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Trademark Enforcement Attorneys

September 5, 2018

Don’t Try This at Home Boys and Girls — The TTAB is no Place for Amateurs

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Image of laptop displaying computer code

September 4, 2018

Doing New and Useful Things Still Isn’t Enough to Meet 35 USC §101

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

September 4, 2018

You Can’t Sidestep Nonappealability of Institution Decisions with Mandamus

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey Intellectual Property Lawyers

September 4, 2018

Federal Circuit Vacates Another IPR as Time-Barred

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

PTAB Litigation

September 4, 2018

What Has Been Served Cannot Be Unserved: §315(b) Time Bar Applies Even if the Suit is Subsequently Withdrawn

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

close up of nike shoe

September 4, 2018

If the Drawing is Sufficient to Determine Infringement, it Complies with 35 USC §112

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

September 4, 2018

Change In Construction of Claims from Petition Required Board to Allow Petitioner to Respond

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

August 23, 2018

BioPharma Patents Quick Tips & News – September 2015 – Throwback Edition

By: Leanne M. Rakers, Principal

Harness Dickey Intellectual Property Lawyers

August 20, 2018

Pfizer’s Biosimilar Antitrust Lawsuit Survives Johnson & Johnson’s Motion to Dismiss

By: Elisabeth A. Koral, Principal

August 16, 2018

BioPharma Patents Quick Tips & News – July 2015 – Throwback Edition

By: Leanne M. Rakers, Principal; Jennifer M. Woodside Wojtala, Principal; Elisabeth A. Koral, Principal

Posts navigation

1 2 … 42 Load more posts

Stay current

  • Subscribe to our Blogs
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2018 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved.