Harness Dickey
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
    • Careers
    • Offices
  • IP Atlas
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Our business model is to cultivate lawyers who know all there is to know about intellectual property, whether it be special requirements under the America Invents Act (AIA), patenting chemical compositions and pharmaceuticals, current developments in software patenting, or combating “bad patents” in federal court litigation.  Lawyers from our various practice groups enjoy sharing their views in our blogs. Please join our audience and help us enrich the discussion. We welcome your participation and insight.

  • All Categories

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • Antitrust Issues
        • Competitor Dynamics
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
        • Interchangeability
      • BioPharma
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • Trademarks
  • All Years
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
    • 2010
    • 2009
  • Authors
    • John H. Ambrose, Jr.John H. Ambrose, Jr. 2
    • Tyson B. BensonTyson B. Benson 4
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • Elizabeth K. BrockElizabeth K. Brock 7
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 1
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 15
    • Donald J. DaleyDonald J. Daley 1
    • Darin W. DeaverDarin W. Deaver 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 11
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 9
    • Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D.Damian H. Kotsis, Ph.D. 4
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 1
    • Robert J. LenihanRobert J. Lenihan 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Michael R. NyeMichael R. Nye 1
    • Joshua A. PartingtonJoshua A. Partington 4
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 15
    • Derek RichmondDerek Richmond 1
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 15
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 14
    • Jeffrey L. SnyderJeffrey L. Snyder 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 3
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 1
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 15
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 13
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
    • Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D.Paul E. Zarek, Ph.D. 3

  • June 24, 2019

    Drafting Considerations after ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc.

    More

  • Trademark Enforcement Attorneys

    June 18, 2019

    How is the Likelihood of Confusion Analysis Different in Registration Decisions Versus Infringement Decisions?

    More

  • Harness Dickey Patent Attorneys Dallas Detroit St. Louis Washington, DC

    June 18, 2019

    Consider All of the Patent Family’s Prosecution History When Communicating with the USPTO

    More

  • image of light bulb to suggest hypothetical biosimilar case study

    June 17, 2019

    Broadening Reissue Claims Must Be Clearly and Unequivocally Supported in Original Disclosure

    More

  • June 16, 2019

    What does Auer’s potential downfall mean for the Patent Office?

    More

  • Harness Dickey IP Litigation St. Louis

    June 5, 2019

    Form-seekers and Non-disclosure Agreements

    More

June 24, 2019

Drafting Considerations after ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc.

By: Nicholas S. Drysdale, Principal

IPR-PGR.com

Matt Cutler’s Professional Blog: Harnessing Patent Office Litigation: A Comprehensive Guide to Inter Partes Review and Post Grant Review Proceedings

Trademark Enforcement Attorneys

June 18, 2019

How is the Likelihood of Confusion Analysis Different in Registration Decisions Versus Infringement Decisions?

By: Joshua A. Partington, Associate

Harness Dickey Patent Attorneys Dallas Detroit St. Louis Washington, DC

June 18, 2019

Consider All of the Patent Family’s Prosecution History When Communicating with the USPTO

By: Jewell N. Briggs, Associate

image of light bulb to suggest hypothetical biosimilar case study

June 17, 2019

Broadening Reissue Claims Must Be Clearly and Unequivocally Supported in Original Disclosure

By: Tyson B. Benson, Associate

June 16, 2019

What does Auer’s potential downfall mean for the Patent Office?

By: Tyson B. Benson, Associate

Harness Dickey IP Litigation St. Louis

June 5, 2019

Form-seekers and Non-disclosure Agreements

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

June 4, 2019

Does Your Trademark Have a 401(k)?

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 30, 2019

Infringement was a Matter of Degree

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Attorneys

May 30, 2019

Lack of All Substantial Rights Deprived Plaintiff of Statutory Standing, But Not Article III Standing

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 23, 2019

We Shall fight in the Fields and in the Streets, We Shall Fight in the Hills; We Shall Never Surrender.

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 21, 2019

Detailed Explanation and Corroboration Made “Sham Affidavit” Doctrine Inapplicable

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 20, 2019

Trademark Licensees Keep Their Rights When Their Bankrupt Licensors Reject the Licenses

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 15, 2019

The Written Description Must Provide More than A Mere Wish or Hope that the Invention Would Work

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 14, 2019

Patent’s Description Was Inconsistent with Patentee’s Claim Construction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 13, 2019

Another IPR Petitioner Had No Standing to Appeal; Does Estoppel Apply to Such Petitioners?

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 13, 2019

Lack of Reasonable Expectation of Success Meant Claims Weren’t Obvious

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Trademark Enforcement Attorneys

May 3, 2019

USPTO Issues New Guidance Regarding Cannabis Related Trademarks

By: Joel R. Samuels, Principal

May 2, 2019

Wake up and Smell the Coffee: Competing Rights in selling “Compatible” Products

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 30, 2019

Prior User Defense Protects Trade Secret Owners Whose Secret is Patented by Another

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 26, 2019

FDA Skepticism Supported Non-obviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts navigation

1 2 … 46 Load more posts

Stay current

  • Subscribe to our Blogs
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2019 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved.